“AVTOMOBIL YOʻLLARI TOʻGʻRISIDA”GI QONUNNING YANGI TAHRIRI LOYIHASIDA SHAFFOFLIK VA KORRUPSIYAGA QARSHI KAFOLATLARNING HUQUQIY TAHLILI
##semicolon##
avtomobil yoʻllari, korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish, shaffoflik, hisobdorlik, elektron tender, Davlat shartnomalari haqidagi ochiq maʼlumotlar standarti (OCDS), mustaqil audit, halollik pakti (Integrity Pact), xabar qiluvchilar himoyasi, jamoatchilik nazorati##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Avtomobil yoʻllari toʻgʻrisida”gi qonuni yangi tahriri loyihasida belgilangan shaffoflik va korrupsiyaga qarshi kafolatlar, ilk bor alohida moddalarda mustahkamlangan qonuniylik, ochiqlik va oshkoralik prinsiplari huquqiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, umumiy foydalanishdagi avtomobil yoʻllarini ekspluatatsiya qilish jarayonlariga ochiq tenderlar orqali xususiy sektorni autsorsing asosida jalb etishning afzalliklari yoritilgan. Tadqiqotda qonun normalarida korrupsiya xavflarini kamaytirishga qaratilgan umumiy qoidalar mavjud boʻlsa-da, ularning amaliy mexanizmlari yetarli darajada aniq belgilanmagani koʻrsatib oʻtilgan. Xususan, elektron tender tizimlari, ochiq maʼlumotlarni Davlat shartnomalari haqidagi ochiq maʼlumotlar standarti (OCDS)da eʼlon qilish, mustaqil moliyaviy va texnik audit, blokcheyn texnologiyasi asosida xarajatlar reyestri, xabar qiluvchilarni huquqiy himoya qilish va “halollik pakti” – Integrity Pact shartnomalarini joriy etish zarurligi asoslab berilgan. Jahon banki, Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va taraqqiyot tashkiloti va Transparency International tavsiyalari hamda Ukraina (“ProZorro”), Chili (“ChileCompra”), Hindiston, Kolumbiya va Polsha tajribalari misolida xalqaro standartlar tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot natijalari yoʻl-transport infratuzilmasi loyihalarini amalga oshirishda shaffoflik va hisobdorlikni taʼminlash, korrupsiya xavflarini kamaytirish hamda jamoatchilik ishonchini mustahkamlash uchun huquqiy va institutsional takliflar ishlab chiqish zarurligini koʻrsatadi.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
309 corruption-related crimes committed by assistant governors in Uzbekistan in 2024. Avialable at: https://kun.uz/en/news/2025/01/20/309-corruption-related-crimes-committed-by-assistant-governors-in-uzbekistan-in-2024?utm_source
Cornell Law School. 23 U.S. Code § 109 – Standards. 2025. Avialable at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/23/109?utm_source
The Economic Times. NHAI tightens contract norms to curb delays, improve quality of highways. 2025. Avialable at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/roadways/nhai-tightens-contract-norms-to-curb-delays-improve-quality-of-highways/articleshow/123949038.cms?utm_source
Остхoek K. Public Procurement in the European Union: Transparent and Fair? An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Directives 2014/23, 2014/24 and 2014/25 on Indicators of Transparency and Corruption. ERCAS Working Paper 65, June 2022. Avialable at: https://www.againstcorruption.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ERCAS-WP-65_2022_Koen_Public-procurement-in-the-European-Union.pdf?utm_source
EU Monitor. Directive on Road Infrastructure Safety Management. 2025. Avialable at: https://www.parlementairemonitor.nl/9353000/1/j9vvij5epmj1ey0/vk0gkfd9vbfw
World Bank. Public-Private Partnerships in Road Asset Management. 2022. Avialable at: https://ppp.worldbank.org/
Messick, R. E. (2011). Curbing fraud, corruption, and collusion in the roads sector. Washington, DC: World Bank. Avialable at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/975181468151765134
Gupta S. The effect of bid rigging on industry prices: A study of the highway construction. Review of Industrial Organization, 2001, vol. 19(4), pp. 451–465.
Lee I.K., Hahn K. Bid-rigging and potential damages. In Auctions for Korean Public Works: Contracts. Review of Industrial Organization, 2002, vol. 21(1), pp. 73–88.
Van den H.G. The parliamentary corruption and state-corporate crime: Collusion as concept between enquiry on fraud in the Dutch construction industry. Law & Social Change, 2006, vol. 44(2), pp. 133–151.
Connor J.M. Price-Fixing Overcharges (2nd ed.). West Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue University. 2009. Avialable at: http://www.agecon.purdue.edu/staff/connor/papers/PRICE%20FIXING_OVERCHARGES_FULL_TEXT.pdf
OECD. OECD Principles for Integrity in Public Procurement. Paris. 2009.
Transparency International Ukraine. Reform of Public Procurement in Ukraine: Jan–Jun 2017 Results. Kyiv. 2017. Avialable at: https://ti-ukraine.org
Kovalchuk A. Examining the Impact of E-Procurement in Ukraine. Center for Global Development. 2019. Avialable at: https://www.cgdev.org
OECD. Public Procurement in Chile. Paris: OECD Publ., 2017. URL: https://www.oecd.org
Lyra M.S., Damásio B., Pinheiro F.L., Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities: A systematic literature review on data-driven methods. Applied Network Science, 2022, vol. 7(1), pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6.
World Bank. Monitoring Road Works Contracts and Unit Costs for Enhanced Governance in Europe & Central Asia (TP-33). 2011.
World Bank. IFRDP Audit Report. 2019.
Transparency International. Integrity Pacts in Public Procurement: An Implementation Guide. 2014. Avialable at: https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/integrity-pacts-in-public-procurement-an-implementation-guide?utm_source
OECD. Government at a Glance. 2019.
Waqar A., Khan A.M., Othman I. Blockchain empowerment in construction supply chains: Enhancing efficiency and sustainability for an infrastructure development. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 2024, vol. 2(1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/27685241.2023.2290343.
Transparency International. Integrity Pacts Atlas Story: India. Avialable at: https://www.transparency.org/ru/dynamic/integrity-pacts-atlas-story/india?utm_source
